navigator wrote:I'm surprised you haven't seen lawsuits from kids wandering around in the woods and getting injured in booby traps
v7guy wrote:i dunno Rory, that sounds like a good friend to have...
JamesDowning wrote:Trees provide nice cammo for a breach team. But I guess we can assume this guy has motion sensors or fences hidden in the woods behind and beside the house.
JamesDowning wrote:Well, I guess I was working off the assumption that the word zombie was the colloquial term for "end of world scenario". It's just easier to say, and has less gravity to it. There are lots of "zombie" scenarios that don't include actual living dead.
All dead threads are Zombies until they have life breathed back into them!mikekey wrote:The camping thread is about Zombies now.
mikekey wrote:Just because I buried a cargo container in my backyard doesn't make me a weirdo.
mikekey wrote:The camping thread is about Zombies now.
DustinC1989 wrote:At the rate we're going, its only a matter of time til "zombie" becomes a censored word or gets edited with a disclaimer from Roadie
JamesDowning wrote:mikekey wrote:The camping thread is about Zombies now.
I think we've been over this - it's the Godwin's law of ORTB.
mikekey wrote:JamesDowning wrote:mikekey wrote:The camping thread is about Zombies now.
I think we've been over this - it's the Godwin's law of ORTB.
You know the Nazi's used these tents in WWII that were really cool, let me find a picture....
dvanbramer88 wrote:The thick forest is a double edge sword. It blocks vehicles and heavy machinery and creates a buffer around your house, but it is also cover/concealment for foot mobiles. Personally an open buffer around the house would be preferable. And than supplement the woods with fences or vehicle barriers. I sort of have a plan for a piece of property.